Article 212 (3) Appellant was selected for appointment by the Department of Education for appeal to the doctrine of consistency but the appointment letters were barred by the provincial government's ban on recruits. In the present case, the effect of the appellant's Supreme Court influence was not different from the cases that had already been decided by the Supreme Court. After these reasons, the department was directed to appoint the appellants for these posts. Issue an appointment letter against which they were. Selected Appeals were allowed Civil Appeal No. 21, 22, 770 to 780 1999 Abdul Wahid Chaudhry, Advocate Supreme Court of Appeals (CCA No. 493 of 2000) for Growth of Appellant (CCA No. 495 of 2000) Hafiz Abdul Rahman Ansari, Advocate Supreme Court of Appeals (No. 494 as C, 496 to 498) Mrs. Afshan Ghazanfar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, Emanol Laha, Assistant Manager, Directorate Colleges, Lahore (for respondents).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
