MUHAMMAD LATIF versus INAYAT ALI
Section 12 Suitable Contract for Sale of Oral Contract for the plaintiff to supply it purely and by the bank through the bank and the draft, but subsequently being in such business or knowing of any of its traders in the market Was denied. The defendant's testimony testified to his denial that he was seeking sale from the plaintiff. The suit plaintiff first dismissed in his testimony that the suit land was leased to another person, but later denied that the person had any legal status or through his testimony. The plaintiff's position is contrary to his position that the written statement stated that the suit was a landlord. The plaintiff's entire testimony on the lease of the plaintiff was full of contradictions that show she was not supportive. Bity, the defendant, had established an oral agreement by presenting oral and documentary evidence. And he failed to prove and failed to refute the plaintiff's evidence in circumstances r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Dhoun Kal lawyer