MST. NAJAM-UN-NISA versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR
Section 13 and 13 of the case were dismissed during the trial for dismissal on the grounds of superior right and its legal representatives were brought before the file which the trial court ruled in the suit but the appellate court Excluded it without proof. The defendants presented the postman, the postal clerk, the sermon, the minor witness and the copy of the postal receipt, the registered rights holder Zameen, to prove the child; The copy of the sale process; the copy of the register along with other documents allegedly and the plaintiff died; there was no material contradiction in the statements of the witnesses and there was also evidence related to many aspects of the evidence. The confession of witnesses was erroneous and illegal. The appellate court's failure to read the trial court's errors and the failure to read the evidence on record was reversed, the appellate court's decision was set aside and the trial court's situation restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer