Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MEHMOOD versus MAKHDOOM AHMAD GHAUS

Article 15 Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 50 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), VIII, R1 High priority of pre-emptive right on the basis of the case of solidarity and the letter of the pedigree, proof of relationship wording incorrect Use iii Written statement The importance of the concept of critical refusal was insufficient, the defendant's contention in such words was that it was not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of section 50 of the Pedigree Table Evidence Act, 1872, without any other controversial evidence. Earlier, the Importer had a suicide attack. The defendant's claim that the defendant's claim by the defendant was not specifically denied in the statement written by the defendant / defendant. The wording that it is wrong that in relation to the relationship was not sufficient for the plaintiff to deny the relationship that it was not disputed by the defendant. The statement of the witness was considered to have been offered to the claimant for the porch before the illegal sale of land matters but his plaintiff denied that it shows that under the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, the plaintiff The waiver exists at the top right, it has to be proved only by evidence and no objection has been made to it only by an advertisement in the newspaper. At that time when the Pedigree Table was brought into the record and the vendor did not contest the claimant's relationship with the shopkeeper, therefore, the objection to the evidence was of no importance as provided by section 50 of the Evidence Act, 1872. Because the plaintiff's display of the minor's legal heritage was merely an irregularity that was treatable and did not cause any harm to the other party. property advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer