AHMAD KHAN versus STATE
Pre-arrest bail against any person against the complaining party or the police against Section 498, the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 452, 337 A (i), 337 A (ii), 337 L (2), 147 and 149 The accused was not charged. Applicants / suspects did not make such allegations, even before the Adel Sessions Judge, for sanction of bail, because the allegations acted brutally and caused several injuries to the complaining party. Was imposed, though its prohibition clause was not attracted. Section 497 (1), but the PC, but only because of the fact, the accused will not be able to get bail before arrest, which was an unusual exception. One of the suspects appeared to be a weak and fragile man of seventy years, and it was only because of this that his responsibility was attributed. , Was raising Lalcara. In this case, for his alleged action, it was said to the extent that the accused was accepted and his interim pre-arrest bail was granted, confirming the extent to which the other two accused were dismissed. Was made and he was ordered to allow pre-arrest bail, withdrawn
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Chak Sheza lawyer