DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, NAROWAL versus ANSAR PERVAIZ
Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) mandatory retirement respondents, who were appointed dispensers, were directed to formalize their services within 90 days, in which they would be considered a failure. ? Through departmental officials, he filed appeals before the service tribunal, which was partially allowed to make an unclean decision under which the sentence for removing him from employment was turned into a mandatory retirement. Respondents offered nearly 14 14/15 years of service \ Service authorities did not take advantage of their inactivity at the relevant time. Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution provides that the Service Tribunal, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case not excluding any important questions about the law of public importance, shall require the retirement of the respondents, The requests were substantially altered to convert.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Astore lawyer
