Find a Lawyer

DAUD SHAH AND ANOTHER versus PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Rr 4 & 5 Direct employees of negligence damages were employees of the Proof Employees Water and Power Development Authority and were charged with damages to the site for payment of wages to the site, following the prosecution. No evidence that the penalties imposed in the departmental proceedings were retained by the validation of the service tribunal, along with the reduction of two steps for a period of two years to the time scale of two years in which the employees were punished. Not available to suggest that employees need to be hurt by government treasury. He was responsible but since then he was found to be negligent in paying the wages, so, the Supreme Court refused to take any exception to the service tribunal to the extent of negligence against him, for a period of two years. The sentence related to the reduction of stages was justified for two years, but it was not appropriate to burden the employees with recovery of damages. The court ordered the department authority to recover the loss of public money from the employees. Placed and fined up to two steps in a timely manner for a period of two years while maintaining the service tribunal's decision The extent of the service was modified according to the decision of the service tribunal. Partially IG HQ allowed immigration advocates contact from Feroz Watan lawyer