Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus RAI MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH

Section 12 was decided for the specific performance of the contract to sell the suit, but the earlier injunction on the execution of the evidence of the contract was rejected so that the plaintiff's / defendant's statement of contract could prove to be valid. Had accepted the claim had no identifiable value. Since he was a party to the litigation and other defendants alleged that he had worked with the plaintiff in preparation of a pre-sale contract, a minor witness had died while the other contract. Failure to give the exact implementation date and admit that he had known the plaintiff for many years but witnessed an opportunity for a controversial agreement. The document was not obtained by a registered validator and was registered by another person who did not have a stamp vendor record on stamps purchased in different pages and serial numbers. The paper on which the controversial agreement was executed was presented by the defendants without justification The part of the sale price critically shadowed the authenticity / authenticity of the sale agreement and pushed the plaintiff's case to the bottom. When the receipt was alleged to have been executed, the stamp containing the receipt, which was normal, had failed. Prove the correct implementation of the agreement on a particular date law firms from Utror lawyer