Find a Lawyer

ABDUS SAMI BUTT versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, LAHORE

Section 16 (2) of the Land Reform Regulation, 1972 [MLR 115], paragraph 13 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 of the Transfer Property Act (1882 of I82), section 41 of the land suit for land suit land. Grant canceled. Martial Law Regulation No. 115 was again granted to its original owner under the Land Reforms Act 1977, the land was sold by the grant to another person and finally the registered sale deed and the applicant through this modification. Bought He said that the sale was also approved in his favor and thereafter the Deputy Commissioner and then Additional Commissioner stated that the applicant / seller of Section 16 (2) of the Land Reforms Act 1977, without the opportunity of hearing. The grant was canceled in the name of the grant, but not by any means. , Deal with natural justice provisions where the grantee actually transferred the land to the buyer of the land for appellate court value, went the wrong way himself and exercised his jurisdiction over the circumstances. Telling Leila that it was not necessary to give notice to the applicant / shopkeeper prior to the resumption of the Land Commission and the Board of Revenue, the obligation to grant the land, if any, under the Land Reform Act So, they were responsible for making sure. In 1977, the Revenue Record was officially noted, but was not done in the current situation; no notice could be found of the restrictions imposed on the grant in favor of the grant / seller authorities. They were themselves responsible for creating situations that would mislead the wrong buyer / applicant so the authorities were not allowed to resume land. jobs for advocates from Sialkot lawyer