Find a Lawyer

MISS SAIMA BUKHARI versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAJANPUR

Sections 17 and 30 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition challenged the applicant of the Domicile Certificate in his constitutional petition approved by the District Coordination Officer, under which he applied for the issuance of the Domicile Certificate. The application was rejected before the applicants were based in DG. In the district of Khan where he was issued the Domicile Certificate, but then the applicant along with his parents shifted to Rajanpur and started his education where the Domestic Coordination Officer DG Khan, on the application of the Domicile Certificate granted to the applicants. Canceled and they applied for the release of the domicile. Certificate in Rajanpur where he shifted with his parents The documentary evidence presented by the applicants had fully proved that he was studying in Rajanpur where his parents relocated to his residence. According to the parents' posting and identification card of the parents, they were living in Rajanpur. Documents from the records prove that the applicant had been living in Rajanpur district for more than a year because his father was there. Were stationed and resided there in circumstances justifying denial of the domicile issuance. The applicant was not given the certificate of Rajanpur district because under section 17 of the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951, he has been able to issue a domicile certificate in his favor. An invalid order was declared illegal and illegal because the District Coordination Officer was unable to exercise his authority advocate for immigration from Chowk Maitla lawyer