Section 302 evidence was appreciated overnight The FIR was not registered at the police station. It did not indicate who had informed the police about the presence of the corpse in the hospital. There was considerable delay which could have been used by the prosecution not only to procure and plan for the complainant and eyewitnesses, but also to construct and prepare a story. The complainant and other witnesses were closely related to the accused and were witnesses to the occasion. Due to inconsistency, failure to inspire trust and no independent source was obtained, no motive was set up by the prosecution. His statement was not described under section 2 his2. CRPC was legally unnecessary and could not be used against the same, not only in clear violation of Section 103, CRPC but it also had no clear value in being a commoner and could not be prosecuted. Was against them, as well as the special property of the accused who was not affected by their identity. The offender, by himself, could not support the prosecution's case when all other pieces of evidence of the prosecution did not encourage trust, the defendant was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
