SHEIKH ABDUL RAZZAQ versus UMER KHAN
A. XXXVII, the promissory note on the stampede for the collection of stamps, and the signatures, as well as the signatures of the defendant's thumb, were witnessed by two persons presented by the plaintiff and the plaintiff. Was investigated and examined. When the testimony itself appeared, after the defendant's borrowing and the execution of the promise caliphate were fully established, the trial court correctly ruled in this case that the original debt was Rs. But Rs 2,20,000 was appearing in the promissory note which amounted to 20,000, since the profit was included, which was not justified, however, the High Court amended it and gave the money. The original loan was made at Rs. 200,000 (two lakh) instead of Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer
