CHAUDHRY ALLAH RAKHA versus NOOR DIN
Section 42 to declare Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XIV, R 5, O XXII, R 4 (4) and O XLI, R 25 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 118 suit. The order obtained by the defendants was fraudulent and unreasonable against the rights of the plaintiff, which was permissible regarding the structure of an additional issue at the appeal stage. Deciding an additional issue relating to the authenticity of the lawyer of the accused who was allegedly executed by the defendant after proving the matter to the defendants, he did not, through the court, testify to the alleged lawyer. And neither did they employ such independent means. Pearson of handwriting / thumb impressions by which he could allegedly prove a power of attorney
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Mangi lawyer
