PERVAIZ AKHTAR versus ZAHID HUSSAIN
Article 202020/7 467/8 468 / 11? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Termination of FIR Parties of Article 199 Constitutional Petition has already taken its dispute regarding the powers of lawyers to be heard in the civil court, where the matter was a court of law. Being a civil court court. The ultimate jurisdiction for the validation of a legal document or the enforcement or non-implementation of another was the sole legal forum, where the competing parties took advantage of their respective right to prove their cases, therefore, to the police Could not be allowed to do. Decide the destiny of these documents out of the authoritarian exercise of authority which was not even enforced by them under the law. The case in civil court was now ready for a final hearing. Instead of dismissing the criminal case, the proceedings under trial there. Was withheld and subjected to a civil court's final decision, under which, if the Power of Attorney was falsified or implicated, the FIRW would be a legal procedure, otherwise it would be natural death in the face of death. The constitutional application under the decision of the civil court will be dealt with accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Khangarh lawyer