Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMIM AKHTAR SAMINA versus JAFFAR HUSSAIN

Article 5, Schedule 9 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), submitting a written statement of constitutional petition for the recovery of articles of Article 199 Dowry, the Family Court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the case, with the courts below the constitutional petition written statement The judgment was filed against. On the claim filed by the applicant, it was not filed by the defendant himself, but rather by his special counsel, under the provisions of section 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the defendant was brought to court. For the purpose of admission, he was obliged to appear before the Family Court. The written statement and its attendance cannot be denied The written statement filed by the respondent's special counsel with the written statement was not deserving of consideration in the view of the law The respondent's written statement was in itself invalid and illegal decision. Was set aside and a remand was obtained to pass the case. Fresh order after hearing by the parties inheritance advocates near Balakot lawyer