Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ARIFWALA

Section 5, Schedule, and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit was sent down to the Appellate Court for the above decision for recovery of restitution allowance and return of the articles of dowry case because it involved the parties. The evidence is not discussed again. The appellate court below rejected the statements of the defendant's witnesses in a line in which the evidence of the defendant's witnesses was inadmissible because they denied the plaintiff's claim for disclosure unless the defendant's witnesses In this regard, the appellate court's view was inappropriate because it disobeyed the direction recorded in the High Court's remand order; There was a final court in the facts and dispute resolution that was unable to proceed. The obligation to appeal, review or amend, in these circumstances, was twice the filing of the Appellate Court. Discuss all the material available on the record, no matter what the appellate court's decision on the value is. Should the omission, which was not upheld by law, the appeal be considered pending before the District Court. Will issue notices to the parties and then decide only after hearing advocate from Tando Adam lawyer