Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMAR versus STATE

The testimony of Section 9 (c), as well as the statements of the two police officers, shows that the bag containing the four was taken by a head constable who searched it and said that the head constable was left without cause, In the presence of top police officers, it could not be understood why the head constable had taken the bag from the accused and why he believed that in the absence of the head constable's offer, section H did not recover. The two prosecution witnesses confessed that the bag allegedly recovered from the suspect, which had a telephone number and other The person was also named, in all likelihood, it cannot be denied that it was the bag belonging to another person who either left her or escaped her well. The bag contained some personal belongings of the head constable, but no such material was found with the accused C. The conviction and sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court was set aside and he was acquitted of the charge and was released after giving him the benefit of the doubt. famous lower court advocate from Tharparkar lawyer