AMIR MUHAMMAD versus SHAD MUHAMMAD
Definitions of sections 302 (b), 324 and 34 of the evidence. The complainant, who was an injured witness, reiterated the case, as well as the other prosecutor's witness, the complainant's son. The doctor, who performed the post-mortem examination of the deceased, suffered injuries from the fire, resulting in the death of the deceased Ocular's account was medical evidence and alleged evidence of both witnesses. Had established his presence on The material was consistent on points and the defense failed to gain anything from a lengthy examination, and on the occasion, their presence on the spot could not be doubted when, in the presence of any material contradiction in their statements, There was no reason to deny it and, when there were slight contradictions in their statements, it could not be concluded, when the defendants' case was proved, within a matter of 35 minutes after the incident took place. Inspirational evidence was reported in the hospital, while the distance between the spot and the hospital was 14/15 km, otherwise, if the incident occurred In reporting, delay, if not late, dismiss the prosecution case because an FIR was filed at any time and the prosecutor does not need to cite every witness such as this in the FIR No negative indication could be taken against him, if no testimony was presented in the prosecutor's wisdom, nothing was done. Whether the prosecution's story or the motive's weakness, if any, the absence of a motive or the failure to prove the prosecution's failure does not adversely affect the testimony of eyewitnesses if they are otherwise holy.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Daulat Pur lawyer