Find a Lawyer

INAYAT ULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 Narcotic Substances (Government Analyst) Regulations, 2001, R4 (2) guarantee, further investigation of the laboratory revealed that the report received the sample The laboratory was to be dispatched within 72 hours, approximately 15 to 15 days after the lawsuit was filed, while in accordance with R4 (2) of the Narcotic Materials Control (Government Analysts) Rule 2001, 2001 Violation of the rule led to the trial of the accused. Further inquiry into the question of whether a case falls within the prohibition contained in sub-section (1) of section 497, CR PC, courts should not overlook the maximum sentence provided for in the law. But if, in a particular case, the court was in a position to come to any conclusion, even at the bail-out stage, that the prosecutor's case was taken to an extreme, he would not receive the maximum sentence, the same as in section 497 ( 1) Beyond the prohibition clause, CCPC such circumstances, the Wing filed a case against the accused that after further investigation, the accused, section 497, sub-section of the CR PC Was entitled to a concession on guarantee under n (2). property advocates from Kech lawyer