ABDUL MAJEED versus ABDUR RASHID
Section 42 West Pakistan Citizens Real Estate Tax Act (V 1958), Section 3 suit, declared that the father had purchased the auction shop from the settlement's son through the auction claiming that he was the real owner of the shop and his father Only an anonymous son requested that he pay the shop price. That he had a shop and his original PTO / PTD and his name appeared in the Department of Excise and Taxation records, the son did not disclose his intention to buy the shop in the name of the father's son. Admitted that his father had adjusted. His compensation book toward the value of the shop, as such, was considered to be closely related to father and son, and it seems that the son was kept in the shop as a license by the father of the original documents, Who might be in the shop. In order to secure custody, a record of such compatibility could not be established \ how the son was shown as the owner in the excise and taxation record, the ownership of the property in the excise and taxation record will not give any honor to the property. The suit was removed. Under the circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Ghuzdar lawyer