Find a Lawyer

AHMAD ALIAS AHMAD YAR versus AHMAD

Article Q 42 Laws of Evidence (1984, of 1984), Article Su59 suit dismissed by trial court for declaration based on unregistered sale deed of land in dispute, but plaintiff's thumb impression The decision on the plaintiff's request for reconsideration has been decided. The document question was whether the appellate court correctly believed that if the impression of the thumb had been sent for comparison, this report would have been against the defendant, There is no evidence on record to prove that the defendant committed illegal sales in favor of the plaintiff. Of the two confirmed witnesses in the contentious document, the defendant was not told about his execution, while the second witness was not presented by the defendant and no reason was given for his absence, In his statement, he further acknowledged that the defendant did not personally know only when applying to compare the thumb impressions, which would have been against the defendant if the appellate court observed that prints were sent for comparison. ? It was an unclean decision and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and the High Court restored the trial court. \ r \ n \ r \ n top advocates from Kasur lawyer