MRS. RUBEENA WAHLA versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER
16 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The rejection of the constitutional nomination papers, the applicant added the declaration of assets with his papers nomination in no detail and the supplement was written "NIL" written in each column of respondents. Had shown a large number of documents to prove that the applicant was the owner of valuable real estate / immovable property. The other applicant very clearly acknowledged that there were several shares in his name which he mentioned. Was not in the declaration of assets included in the nomination papers. Unlike other applicants due to Income Tax, the Income Tax Commissioner was not entitled to any relief under the circumstances, which has been permanently posted by the applicants. What should be said about equal relief under the Constitution? , Under orders not to be imposed on any jurisdiction, the application was dismissed. \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
