Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus ZAHAR KHAN

Section 96A, XXXVII, suits for recovery of money based on promise gap, petition for leave to defend defendant, which processed the promise note and receipt in relation to the amount received from the claimant, In accordance with the terms of the Plaintiff's Promise Caliphate, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant who applied for leave to defend the case, which allowed the Defendant to object to the Pro Note / Receipt Implementation was acknowledged which stated that the pro note / invoice was executed as a guarantor of the guarantee, in the circumstances in question / pro note this document To prove that the execution of Pro Note Burden, executed by him as a guarantor, was on the defendant, but he could not prove this fact by presenting it to the trial court, in the circumstances against the defendant. The trial court's improper judgment and the absence of any weakness or illegality in the decree cannot be interfered with in the appeal. how to become a advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer