SAMI ULLAH ALIAS KACHU versus STATE
Definition of Article 2 302 and evidencere evidence failed to present credible, reliable and credible evidence against the accused accused of material contradictions / contradictions and inaccuracies, which did not prove the accused The presence of eyewitnesses, on the spot, seems to be credible as they failed to provide a plausible explanation for their presence on the spot. A large number of the complainant's villagers have been reported and she has died. The complainant assisted in the removal of the son's body, but there is no independent and involuntary witness. Was presented to support the prosecution's story, which is relevant witness testimony, although it cannot be ignored on the basis of the relationship and the witness's lonely statement can be the basis of conviction, but in this case There should be harmony that in the present case, the evidence of the missing prosecution was taken into account, the accused was corrupted, but similar evidence was denied regarding the co-accused, who was assigned the same role, No prominent role was identified between the two accused, the victim was attributed to the shooting, Lee said. N slain man had just received a wound. During a post-mortem examination, the defendant's misdemeanor could neither dispel the verbal evidence defects nor was it sufficient to justify himself, the accused fugitive could not be prosecuted for prosecution in the prosecution's case. , The prosecution had failed to prosecute the accused beyond doubt. Of the two witnesses, the trust did not encourage and this
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Multan lawyer