SAKHI AN versus STATE
After closing the evidence through the Section 404040 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), 5302 prosecution, the eyewitness testifying again, if there was any error, error or negligence, then correction under section 404040. If the CRPC had evidence closes, then only the public prosecutor's fault, then it could be ignored, but then the complainant's private council also closed the evidence under his signature, the official Such practice cannot be abolished by the legal signature of the lawyer and the choice of closing the evidence of the complainant's private lawyer twice. Similarly, after the full disclosure of the defense version, to assist in examining the witnesses, the practice of defense as a witness will arise, resulting in the whole story of the defense being open to the eyewitnesses, thus This will be the cause of scrutiny at a deserted stage. The prosecution's request for prejudice and re-seeking of the accused's right will also be deviated from the ING left witness denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer