COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PESHAWAR versus MAJ. GENERAL MEHRABUDDIN
Seizure of a car purchased under the former diplomat immunity under section 19 and 32 section R506 (I) / 88, dated 26 6 1988 section RO 506 (I) / 88, for the last five years after the original purchase. For the claim of the enclavement car in 26 6 1988, it was named after the respondents, who was an ambassador, under section 266 1988, in the light of section RO 506 (I) / 88, official liabilities, duties and taxes. Was not involved in the payment of, the State Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed the sale permit to the defendant. favor Some of the benefits related to the purchase, maintenance and sale of the car were levied on the respondent as a result of the implementation and enforcement of the prom law, and due to the completion of the stipulated period, the respondent lost such benefits. The law could not be misinterpreted to do so. Instructions for restoring respondents in situations \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
