Find a Lawyer

W.T.A. NOS. 1010/LB OF 2004 AND 18/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 16TH APRIL, 2005. versus W.T.A. NOS. 1010/LB OF 2004 AND 18/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 16TH APRIL, 2005.

Section 31B Additional Wealth Tax Mandatory or Discretionary Assisi argued that it was not compulsory to receive additional tax but it was arbitration which required the determination of its responsibility on the merit of each case. Accuracy was never implemented mechanically or imperatively to impose it. The additional tax and section language allowed the appraisal officer to use discretion when analyzing the competence of each case; the appellate tribunal previously denied the appellate authority's findings that additional taxation was required by law And not to arbitrary dissimilarity. Appeal on additional tax issue was accepted and departmental appeal rejected \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Thana Bula Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes