I.T.AS. NOS. 1337/LB, 815/LB, 1203/LB OF 2003 AND 1349/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 24TH NOVEMBER, 2005. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1337/LB, 815/LB, 1203/LB OF 2003 AND 1349/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 24TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
Section 62 (1) The production rate of 82% 07 yield on account of production of accounts, evidence etc. was rejected and the same was applied to 84%, also applied to various heads of P&L account. Ascertaining not being certified under, the Assisi claimed that there was no notification. Under section 62 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, was issued to remove the deficit, if any, which was not brought to the record for the rejection of the books of account and the result declared Summarizing additions The book was rejected. And while the final accounts were defamatory of the principles set out, the commercial version announced on the basis of parallel issues could not be rejected and unless the concrete material was brought on record to be recorded, the commercial version was in law. Was not sustainable and even on the facts. And in the event of the circumstances of the event, the announced commercial results were deemed acceptable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
