MUHAMMAD ZAFAR versus SAJJAD MUNIR
Section 12 deals with the execution of the alleged contract to sell specific performance of the contract, as well as the issue of refusal by the defendants / alleged dealers to obtain a settlement, agreement implementation and consideration. An issue was resolved in connection with the recovery of the suit, the burden of proof was placed on the plaintiffs when the appellate court was to investigate the case that the sale agreement had been tampered with, but the plaintiff alleges tampering. Denied and set up, they requested the original document and filed against the security submission. Check inches. 10,000 for the verification of his request, which was accepted when the documents in question were examined, erased and altered, the search granted by the appellate court, in the circumstances. It was fully justified that no question of law arose for the determination, the second appeal was dismissed and the security submitted by the defendants was confiscated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Patoki lawyer