Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus GHULAM HAIDER

Section 2A [As entered by the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act (Ordinance) Ordinance (XIII of 1983), the proprietor's successor question left the original owner behind in 1934, two widows. After the conversion of two sisters and a daughter and the original owner, when it was confirmed in favor of two widows in connection with the property left, the original owner, one year after the death of one of the widows, the other. The marriage was contracted and it was said that the property had been changed in favor of the daughter due to the marriage. The deceased; then the second widow of the deceased, died in 1937 and after her death. The property was transferred to the daughter of the late owner's daughter in the dispute. Syed slain daughter also died in 1942 and after her death, the property was transferred to the rights of her husband and the deceased was the original owner's two sisters. The original owner claimed to have committed suicide, suing for the claim that he was entitled to inherit the property under question. The trial court's order and petitioner filed a review against the appellate court's decision that it was customary for the daughter of the real owner of the property to confirm the change in heritage in the dispute and it was customary Later it was owned because the family of the parties was ruled under customs, so there was nothing illegal in the approval of the pearl after the death of the appellate court in favor of the husband of the deceased daughter of the original owner. It was believed that in view of the customs, a change of favor was granted in favor of the husband of the deceased daughter of the original owner. The zury was established. Variation look advocate for immigration from Kech lawyer