Find a Lawyer

HAJI SHEIKH NOOR DIN & SONS THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ

Section 17, Proviso Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, Provision of Constitutional Request for Law Supplementation Request for Certificate Restoration Certificate Non-submission of Certificate by Owners Section 17 (1) of Payment without Certificate (a). The Wages Act, 1936, therefore, rejected the appeals. The request made by employers was that the condition for filing a certificate with the appeal was unconstitutional. Unless otherwise understood, the interpretation, which directly or indirectly invalidates such provision of law, could not be sustained in the eyes of the law. The constitutional petitions that were filed to defeat section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 could not be appealable. Has not proceeded, with no certificate as required by Section 17 of the Payment Wages Act, 1936. As a result, the Labor Court passed the order in accordance with Supreme Court law, which had the necessary effect, therefore, no interference was sought, any deficiency or illegal interference in the order passed by the Labor Court. Has not been excluded. Under the circumstances law websites from Mithi lawyer