Find a Lawyer

TARIQ SADDIQUE KHOKHAR versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE

Sections 154, 156 and 157 of the Police Rules 1934, R25 2 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition FIR were registered against the applicant's registration session court order under which the complainant complained The caller was instructed to refer to the relevant section HA with a written request for his complaint and the section HA was directed to file a case if the contents of the application showed a confessional offense. Be listed. It was that the said order was not in accordance with the law, as the section HO had to enter first. A register was instructed to file an FIR section by the substance of the complaint and then by an illegal order if the contents of the application indicate a confessional offense, and for this reason it is in accordance with Section 154, Cr. If so, file the case. The PC questioned whether the information / complaint on the inquiry made after the registration of the FIR secreto was true or false n 154, CR PC is pending in nature, Section HO has the relevant statement of complainant. There is no option but to record in the register, if any identifiable offense was disclosed in the same way, otherwise he would file a report under CR 155. Consequently, Section HA was directed to file an FIR if the commission reported an identifiable offense in the information reported to him by the respondent complainant and the same case required under section 156. Upon inquiry, CCP read with police R 25 2 (3). The constitutional request for action under the Rules, 1934, or section 157, CR PC, as the case may be, was dealt with accordingly. top advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer