MESSRS MATEEN CORPORATION versus MESSRS PLASTICRAFTERS (PVT.) LTD.
Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11 The suit for specific performance of the contract which is a mortgage as a condition of the bank as a claimant Payment on can be forfeited. Within sixty days from the signing of the contract no payment was made in the contract for payment of the balance amount was obligated to commence the sale of the NOC was signed on the Bank Agreement 1 8 1994 by the respondent The bank refuses to issue the NOC to the plaintiff 5 In view of the agreement in 1995, the plaintiff was accused of releasing the property in 2003 by filing a lawsuit by the plaintiff in 2004. Accreditation The defendant denied the performance of the contract on 7-5 1998, the limit was started from the date of denial and ended on 5 5 1998, the last date for filing the case was 5 1998 1998 and Article 113 of the limitation Act 1908 Once the threshold set by Expiration is reached, no reason for the action can be restored. n Therefore, obtaining information on the release of property by the bank, it was submitted to the claimant in 2003 or 2004, when his case was banned in 1998, when, under R 11, CPC Was rejected because the case was banned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Hangu lawyer