TAYYAB versus STATE
The definitions of Articles 320, 337G and 427 were based on the conviction of only one witness, the trial court's witness only said that he had heard the people there saying that the accused was busted. Was driving The eyewitness did not name the person whom he heard saying that the claims of the witnesses who were injured in the same bus were made through other evidence on the record, the injured in the same bus. Evidence of testimony regarding the move could not be safely accepted by the trial court; at the trial, the appeal against the conviction and sentence of the accused was set aside, it was accepted and Was released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Shikarpur lawyer
