Find a Lawyer

BILQEES BEGUM versus REGISTRAR OF PROPERTIES

Section & 42 & Su 54 of the Anonymous Transaction Proof The plaintiff claimed that the house he bought in the name of his wife / defendant in Benami Md., Should be declared as the owner of the said house or wherever the plaintiff claims. Did not At the time of the purchase of the said house in the name of the defendant, there was a clear agreement or agreement between him and him that the house was his property and the defendant was merely Benimar in the absence of evidence of such agreement / understanding. , The plaintiff could not. Even the Benami homeowner should be sued in court even if it was said that the house was purchased from his funds in the name of his wife / plaintiff that he only named the plaintiff's wife to keep him happy. I bought a house in question that I had neglected myself. The plaintiff's claim regarding the status of the transaction because she can be satisfied and happy to be the sole owner of the home The plaintiff's claim about the benami cha case was not settled by the plaintiff, even if the trial court Upon the acquisition of the order, the house was sold and the buyer was in possession, but under section 144 the defendant's right cannot be defeated by the transaction. Because the claimant was not the landlord, he was not eligible for transfer under the Transfer and Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the land was to be restored to the claimant by evicting its buyer. advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer