Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KARIM THROUGH ATTORNEY versus OFFICE OF THE CANTONMENT BOARD

Sections 111, 112, 113, 114 and 115 of the Pakistan Cantonment Property Rules, 1957, RR 2, 8 and 9 of the Special Relief Act (sections 1 of 1877), sections 12 and 55, of the specific performance rights of the Cantonment Property Transfer Agreement Moving the cantonment property vests with the Cantonment Board is subject to the federal government's grant of leasing or separating the cantonment property against the procedure and the approval of the appropriate authority subject to the conditions set forth in the Pakistan Cantonment Property Rules 1957. The illegal executive officer of the Cantonment Board, in the present case, accepted the plaintiff's offer to lease the cantonment property for 99 years, without fulfilling the conditions set forth in the Pakistan Cantonment Property Rules 1957. The delivery was violated and the High Court upheld such a course of public action, only discretion was taken to extend its favor to the plaintiff. In line with the observation that the duties of a public official are cut off in all four corners of its boundaries, it has to work within that boundary and overcome any bounds of any nature, such as in the present case, the sole It will be deliberately intended to bestow favor or bless on a person, clearly violating the law of the plaintiff's offer, therefore, was above the legal competence of the executive officer of the Cantonment Board. when you need a advocate from Gambet lawyer