Find a Lawyer

AFZAL HUSSAIN versus ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

Sections 2 (XXXX), 46 and 48 (1) of the Payment Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 2 (vi) Appeal to the High Court to suspend the High Court under the Golden Handshake Scheme Complaint Request Was not making any profit and was moving. It was difficult for the loss and management of the company to effectively continue the work of the company, it entered into an agreement with the CBA to terminate the workers under the Golden Handshake scheme, which according to the settlement all permanent Employees were required to resign by the CBA and, among other liabilities, the appellant's complaint, along with the additional benefits under the Golden Hand Shakes Scheme, was that, in terms of settlement / agreement, payment to the appellant. The payments were not made under the Wages Act 1936, but a check was submitted against them. According to the work of section 2 (xxx) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, according to the definition of outstanding worker, the due effect was not included in the category of \ labor and the appellant submitted his resignation with acceptance. And as a result he obtained approval from all the departments of the employer and received some money in the form of provident fund and other liabilities, while the benefit scheme, under the Golden Hand Shake, paid him by check. That couldn't be revealed. The volatility of the check could not rule out all the facts that were never provoked and, over time, the appellant was made, under the circumstances it was not labor and could not be sustained. On this basis, a complaint to the Labor Court is requested here top advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer