Find a Lawyer

MST. AFSAR SULTANA versus NIKHAT PERVEEN

Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract The sale of the suit house in the interests of the professionals in the interest of the original owners / sellers, provided that the seller paid some money to the seller and the remaining amount It was to be paid in three months. Contract Date Wendy paid some money after more than seven months instead of the three-month deadline and failed to pay the balance, upon the death of the original owner, against the legal heirs of the vendor / original owner. The performance claim was filed mainly because the seller's legal heirs did not contest the agreement that they did not pay their share of the contract because they failed to pay the balance amount in the High Court, In its original aspect, an order was passed instructing the trader to collect the balance amount. Within two weeks in court, but the seller could not submit the same amount within the extended time, the case was moved to civil court and the transfer civil court dismissed the case that the seller could not prove it. He was ready to pay the appellate court part of the contract, however, the trial court's reversed endorsement confirmed Wendy's non-payment of the balance amount, which was clearly his own acknowledgment of Wendy's terms of the contract. Incomplete Wendy also pleaded or did not prove that there was a further agreement in connection with this payment. Limited to specific performance of the contract was not deserving of its decision to grant his prayer. Because the appeal is invalid and invalid, it cannot be protected top civil advocates from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer