WATTAN PARTY THROUGH PRESIDENT AND OTHERS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CABINET COMMITTEE OF PRIVATIZATION, ISLAMABAD
The constitutional application under Articles 184 (3) and 185 (3) of the Constitution in which the proposals of the Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000 have been implemented and the proposed constitution relating to its implementation is Pakistan (1973), Arts 153, 154, 184 (3) ) And 185 (3) the privatization of the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation was declared valid, the Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 Constitution of the Supreme Court was not ultra-virus, while using judicial review powers it was observed that Article 153 of the Constitution And is aware of the 154's mandate, establishment and working. The common interests were the cornerstone of the federal structure provided to protect the rights of the Council's federal unit. He said that the main body was not working at the moment and, in view of the statement of the federal government's lawyer that the council was active, the federal government was instructed to accelerate as far as possible. Work from but not later than six weeks; Approval for the privatization of Pakistan Steel Mill Corporation by the Joint Council of Persons continued to hold this sector on 29th 1997 but advised during the interventions and advised by the Federal Government. In view of the controversial stand taken. To the effect that the order of approval for the privatization was never remembered by the Council and the corporation's lawyer held that the issue of privatization was later abandoned by the proprietor, If this was the case in the order, the Common interests were sent to the Council for consideration. Generally, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the executive's policy-making domain, using the judicial review option, while the current case does not exclude state-owned projects.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
