Find a Lawyer

KHAIR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Sections 2 (2), 2 (9), 11 and 96 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appellate Statutory Decisions Separate Orders Applying the Rule of Judiciary Two separate against the collection of rent by the landlord and the tenant. Separate case was filed The trial was held in favor of the tenant under a stable decision and the landlord's trial was dismissed by the trial court in two cases, but the landlord moved only one order. Appeals against the suit preferred The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in favor of the landlord. And the High Court upheld the judgment and decree of the case given by the appellate court, which the tenant raised in the jurisdiction of the restoration, since the landlord only filed an appeal against an injunction, The order passed in the second case will again serve as a judiciary. In the case filed by the landlord, the appeal against the order passed by the trial court, which was the basis of the injunction documents in the case filed by the tenant, will prevail in the appellate court's order and this will be the tenant's suit for the landlord. It was not necessary to challenge the decree passed in order to claim the same relief which the landlord could obtain in an appeal against the decree passed in his case, a case in which a decision was made thereafter separately. Orders It was more a matter of form than substance. An appeal against a decree in the landlord's suit is sufficient to relieve the decision rendered by a substantial judgment. The appeal was accepted by the Court of Appeal in the court, the case was filed by the tenant. power of attorney advocate Patika lawyer