Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TASHFEEN versus STATE

Article 2 302/34, 4? 32 and 9449 Article ?5 (()) of the Constitution were filed immediately after designating the accused, the specific role of the victim being injured and the testimony of the complainant. The defendant confessed to accepting the incident with his respective weapon in the store, the defense record request did not say whether the incident happened in accordance with the proposed defense incident or that it was a sudden fight by the suspect. There was strong evidence of aggression against them and only the fact that the accused was a brother. It was not enough to support Ocular's self-defense plea of two injured and natural witnesses to the unforgivable role of being injured and being a natural witness, but medical evidence, evidence and evidence to prove the charge. Confession was a crime. The same evidence was also strongly affirmed that it was not clear who was particularly responsible for the fatal injury to anyone, and the sentence of life imprisonment for the accused and the accused was sufficient to meet the end of justice. family advocate from Parachinar lawyer