Find a Lawyer

NASIR JAMAL versus THE STATE

Articles 302, 324, 337 F (iii), 337 F (v), 393 and 34 Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt is that during the identification parade, neither of the two witnesses appeared before the prosecution's witnesses before the presence of both witnesses. Was not familiar The joint suspect was identified, but a piece of evidence had already been denied by the trial court. During the identification process, it was stated that the two co-accused were not, without doubt, by witnesses, one of the co-accused. Although allegedly armed with Kalashnikov, that weapon was never recovered from other alleged suspects, Kalashnikov was never recovered and was never sent to the forensic science laboratory, nor was there any evidence. Only to show that the weapon was ever used, it was said that the piece of evidence contained no proven evidence. The victim was not found, whose statements of alleged extra-judicial confession witnesses, revealed that all the accused had jointly confessed to their crime, the manner and the circumstances under which the accused had allegedly committed the crime, It would be unsafe to rely on such evidence, in the circumstances the statements of the witnesses quoting the evidence of Wajitkar said that even the co-accused was not sufficient to rely on the absence. Evidence of any credible evidence that the two accomplices were entitled to take advantage of the doubt in both cases, it was appealed to the extent that the two accomplices were allowed and both were acquitted of the charges. And they were ordered to be released tax advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer