Find a Lawyer

SHAHZADA ASHRAF DURRANI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Section 19 Laws in Evidence (1984, 10 of 1984), Article 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Implementation of Proprietary Rights Principle of Imposition of Appeal, The determination of the disputed land was leased to the applicant's grandfather and In accordance with the Board's decision. The Revenue, 29 1992 1992, the petitioner was entitled to the proprietary rights of the land, because the provincial government did not comply with the order of the Board of Revenue from one excuse or the other plea taken by the petitioner was that Property rights should be granted at discounted rates. At the expiration of the lease in 1956, with the first stand of the Provincial Government and the Board of Revenue justified, the authorities returned to challenge the applicant's claim for the lease deed's proprietary rights. The letter of 1891 and 299 1877 made it clear that after the end of the first generation of the original leasehold person, under the lease instrument, the authorities were obliged to sell the land with the first right of refusal of the applicants. To be at a reasonable price, which was different from the market price, the order of the Board of Revenue had been finalized and the applicant refused according to this order. Only the surviving grandson of the original leaseholder, who was entitled to the proprietary rights of the subject land under the instrument dated 30 11 11 1891, is not available on record as to why the Board of Revenue's order could not be implemented. law firms from Lalshanra lawyer