HAIBAT NAWAZ KHAN versus MST. NAJMA BIBI ALIAS NAJMA PARVEEN
Section 5, Schedule 9 and Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application for Recovery Receipts was given by the respondents in the preparation of documentary evidence, evidence, after which the applicant submitted his oral evidence and Submission of documentary evidence was adjourned; on the date of adjournment of the hearing, an attempt was made to present a certified copy of the certificate issued by the concerned chairman, the Union Council, and to prove that the defendant. Defendant divorced Family Court on Ali's objection, however, an improper order denied the applicant permission A. Presenting that the documenter claimed that the document submitted was a certified copy of the public document and was given to the Family Court with the jurisdiction and discretion to allow it to be presented, That the issue was compiled by the document Family Court whether the applicant had divorced. Respondent's evidence was not closed and the document deferred to prepare the Case W documentary evidence was sought by the applicant under the relevant, impugned order of the Family Court, setting it aside in the interest of justice. And the applicant was allowed to pay the costs of the document in court, however, will examine the acceptance and legal effect of this document.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
