RAHIM KHAN versus STATE
Section 13 Definition of Evidence The prosecution's witness, who was absolutely consistent, remained connected and the success of the cross-examination, without any doubt, proved the case against the accused, in which case there was no reason for the suspect's false involvement. Was not Police recorded any aggression or reversal in the case so that the defense in this case did not succeed in breaking the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, who fully supported the prosecution's story and had no illicit desire. Could not be identified. They could have been encouraged to lie against the accused, saying that the witnesses themselves belonged to the police department, which itself could not be considered a good ground for rejecting their statements, in which case the accused was successfully convicted. And the defense failed. Remove any material contradictions or contradictions from the statements of the prosecution witnesses Section 404040 (?), not required by CRPC to appear as its own witness, which contradicts the story of the prosecutor who was fatal to his case. , The trial court's contentious decision under which the accused was sentenced and sentenced, was upheld in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Shakargarh lawyer