Find a Lawyer

SAIFUR REHMAN versus ANARKALI

Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal, Dialogue Articles and the Case for Reinstatement The following courts had consistently claimed that the plaintiff appeared as their own witness. And he also presented it to his father and mother-in-law, who had fully confirmed his claim. The court, using its constitutional jurisdiction, correctly testified that the unconfirmed evidence of the witnesses on the record was properly appreciated, even if it was possible to come to a different conclusion on the scrutiny of the evidence, Unless it is shown that such a result is wrong / unreadable by the courts, which has affected the results of the goodwill. Impugned decisions and orders do not result in incorrect reading / reading of evidence. Were neither based on law nor recorded in violation of the law. And the injunction cannot be interfered with by the High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. online advocate from Panjgur lawyer