Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IJAZ AHMAD versus STATE


Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 311 and 34 bail, denied the accused in the FIR lodged on the murder of his sister. During the Investigation Section P (Investigation) received an anonymous letter about this anonymous letter. The suspect's deceased sister was allegedly due to illicit contact by the accused, her son and others who were murdered according to the FIR, the accused / complainant stated in connection with the murder of her deceased sister. What was, was not possible and were against the wishes of the common man because it was against the common sense that the male of the accused family would leave the men and in this case without any resistance offered by the accused, including the accused. Will kill a woman. The facts stated by the investigating officer could not be retrieved from the record, were not applicable. The facts stated in the FIR by the accused / complainant were found to be false contradictory practices. F, including the suspect / complainant, prevented them from granting arbitrary relief on bail in conjunction with the facts brought to the record during the investigation; the alleged compromise fact itself spoke of the defendant's proportional treatment. Because they were originally found. The culprits of his original sister were doing everything possible to protect their skin from this case. The accused failed to understand that a compromise could be made / accepted only after his departure from the court and this was not a fit case for his acceptance or otherwise the offenses against him were also prohibited under section 497 (1). Under the clause, the accused was not entitled to a guaranteed waiver in the circumstances of the CR PC

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.