Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAHMAN BHATTI versus MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 17 of the Colony Manual, Article 199 of the Colony, Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), provides for the purpose of transferring colonies from one colony to another, wherein the proprietary land in one district rests with the state land located in another district. But the authorities were not allowed to exchange applicants that they were discriminated against, because the authorities allow such exchanges with influential people. Walnutty Petitioners were not tenants but landowners, so was Section 17 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912. They were not attracted to the case, as they had left the land to be a tenant, the applicants were given permission to exchange only in one colony, but the applicants had given their land to a colony. Applicants were requested to convert to another colony and only the government applied in such power. Applicants were rejected by the Board of Revenue, who was authorized to buy auction or oat, in the Colony Manual. Cannot exchange error under paragraph number 364 of the Colony Directive provided , Without a government express order that should be sought only in exceptional cases when the proprietary rights were obtained in a grant, the High Court denied the interference petition in the order passed by the authorities was dismissed in the circumstances. ask a advocate free from Khoski lawyer