Find a Lawyer

BANK OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2 OTHERS ---RESPONDENTS

Sections 9, 10, 22 and 24 The borrower's suit for recovery of the bank loan was taken by BankN Bank on 13 10 2000, giving legal notice to the borrower, concluding that the borrower Had already made the default, which would require the bank to operate. Legal Notes In the present case, the contents of the Legal Notes did not show any default date and it was unanimously stated that the borrower failed to pay the agreed installment in accordance with the terms of the financing, the statement of accounts It shows that the debtor paid the first installment on 12 1, 2000 and thereafter he did not pay any money, and thus he had no other document available on the default record, which would indicate The default date was 91 and 2002, not the bank's charge. The plaintiff had to succeed on the strength of his case and not on the weakness of the other party that the bank failed to prove its sole contention that its app default date was 95 1 2002 and not 12 1 2000. The EHL has been rejected by the Banking Court order online advocate from Gawadar lawyer