Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus AHMAD DIN

Article 77 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintaining Controversy of Reality Profit Claim Claiming Revenue to Claim Plaintiff Claim Receiving Profit From Revenue Claims and Revenue in favor of Plaintiff's Decision The court-approved order was rejected by the appellate courts, but the Board of Revenue reinstated the judgment and order passed by the Revenue Courts, and the plaintiff ordered the plaintiff to sue in favor of the plaintiff. The landlord and tenant had no relationship between the parties, because he paid. His bat was transferred to another partner of Khata, who was in his possession, and above that, the plaintiff purchased two measles numbers from two other persons, including the measles number in his possession, Thus, the occupation of the shopkeepers was underway and the plaintiff was legally the owner of this part of the land under the Hill of the Court of Revenue, under the law, as the evidence has rightly shown that the landlord and tenant relationship. The parties were present and thus the decision of the plaintiff's case was decided which was not confirmed by the Board of Revenue Appellate Courts on the basis of documentary evidence. Because the issue is related to this question. After reviewing the facts of the facts set by the Board of Revenue, along with the Revenue Court, they will be reluctant to interfere in their findings. The High Court refuses to interfere with the decision and has been approved by the Board of Revenue Petition. Order rejected \ r \ n pakistani advocates Sagri lawyer